Baker County ranchers sign sage grouse pact
Veteran Oregon cattle rancher Bill Moore has a simple explanation for signing the first individual conservation agreement for Greater sage grouse.
He wants protection from restrictions and regulations that might be slapped on his rangeland if the bird is listed as threatened or endangered next year.
“Our motivation was to not only try and do some conservation for sage grouse, but obviously to continue to be able to use our private lands for grazing,” Moore said.
The agreement with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service covers 7,290 acres of grazing land split about 45 miles apart in Baker and Malheur counties. The accord, technically called a Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances, or CCAA, lays out what the Moore and his wife, Nancy, will do to improve conditions for the Greater sage grouse. The bird is a candidate for the federal endangered species list.
The USFWS will decide whether to list it in September 2015. The decision date has touched off a scramble by ranchers, local governments and wildlife officials to collaborate on voluntary conservation measures.
The Moores will remove juniper trees — which crowd out sage and native grasses and provide perches for predators — and put escape ramps in water troughs, mark fences so birds are less likely to fly into them and keep cattle out of leks, as sage-grouse breeding areas are called.
The agreement is the first in Oregon involving an individual property owner and probably will be the last, wildlife service spokeswoman Anna Harris said.
A half-dozen counties are pursuing a model established this year in Harney County. In that case, the county’s Soil and Water Conservation District served as the intermediary with USFWS. The district holds the CCAA agreement and establishes management plans with individual ranches. The work, which recently won a national stewardship award, allows ranchers to work with a local group they know and trust, rather than a federal agency.
In return, landowners get 30 years protection from additional restrictions or regulations even if the greater sage-grouse is added to the endangered species list.
Bill Moore, who was 2008-09 Oregon Cattlemen’s Association president, said he appreciates the county-wide efforts but pursued his own because he isn’t sure soil and water conservation districts will be able to finish management plans before the decision deadline.
Each agreement requires someone out on the ground, developing management plans for individual ranches. That’s not something that can be done “three, four, five or 10 in a day,” he said.
“Our’s is a done deal,” Moore said. “I wasn’t willing to put it on hold until the counties got their’s done.”
Like other ranchers who have signed agreements, Moore said the management requirements are not a big deal.
Cutting juniper, for example, improves grazing ground because grasses come back.
“Most of the stuff that we’re going to do for sage grouse, it’s probably going to help us,” Moore said. “It’s darn sure not going to hurt us.”
He called the requirements “insignificant management changes” that are “not that invasive on what we’re doing.”
The other benefit to signing an agreement is that CCAAs have withstood court challenges filed by environmentalists, Moore said.
“One of the real attractions is they cannot inflict any more management changes on us for 30 years,” Moore said.